The subject of the book is interesting, but it was not very easy to read. Too many characters were introduced. It would have been better to use generic terms for characters who didn't play a part in the solution to the problem. Or use the title, when the individual changed throughout the years. i.e., "the DA at the time". I started keeping a list of names and it got out of hand quickly.

Including the emotions of the four incarcerated men would have created emotional involvement by the readers. Other than the incarcerated saying they didn't do it, how did they feel, hopeless, resolved to their fate, maybe they felt they were paying for past sins? A helpful approach would be a parallel timeline for those arrested after 15 years.

What were they doing the night of, up until the end of the book. I never saw a resolution to the local government corruption alluded to. Naming names would have made the book a best seller! Also, a background on the prejudice of Indians would have been helpful.

This plot is very unique. The book is fast paced and I never put it down for long. While the main plot theme--in the visible world--is farfetched, I could still see it happening.

Theo, attending college in Australia, needed a career shift and moved to Kansas (seriously?) where her brother lived. She used a local diner as her office, and, there, met another author. They strike up a friendship which ends tragically for him and life changing for her.

The sub plots also serve to keep the story moving--including a love interest for Theo; a web-based blog of conspiracy theorists who think people are disappearing and being experimented on; and a family of survivalists.

Years before, one of Theo's favorite authors died. The unique situation behind his death is explained and Theo is caught up in it.